It is assumed that the failure to diagnose caused a 14 percent decrease in his chance of survival. All rights reserved. This is a “pretty tricky little case”. Instant Facts: The estate of Herskovits (P) brought an action in professional negligence against Group Health (D) as a result of which the decedent’s chance of … Three days ago, Washington’s Court of Appeals issued a decision explaining the state’s Supreme Court precedents that entitle patients wronged by their doctors to recover compensation for their lost chances to recover from illness: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 664 P.2d 474 (Wash. 1983), and Mohr v. Grantham, 262 P.3d 490 (Wash. 2011). KENNETH YOUNG et al, Petitioners, v. GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE OF PUGET SOUND et al, Respondents. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound In a wrongful death action, proof that the defendant's conduct increased the risk by decreasing the chances of survival of a plaintiff is sufficient as to the issue of proximate cause. It is not required that the P must have had a 51% chance of survival before the negligence. of Puget Sound, 635 F. Supp. Professional & Technical. Co. v. American Cyanamid Co. Jasko v. F.W. The personal representative of Leslie Herskovits' estate initiated this survivorship action against Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (Group Health), alleging failure to make an early diagnosis of her husband's lung cancer. This preview shows page 95 - 97 out of 526 pages.. 67. Dormaier v. Columbia Basin Anesthesia, P.L.L.C, 177 Wn. Cancel anytime. GENRE. The Plaintiff in this matter, Edith Herskovits (Plaintiff), … Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative: Negligent Creation of a Substantial Risk of Injury is a Compensable Harm I. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. The operation could not be completed. It is assumed that the failure to diagnose caused a 14 percent decrease in his chance of survival. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. Trial court granted summary judgment for D. WA Supreme Court reversed, reinstated P's claim. Author information: (1)Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington, USA. We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. [citation needed] The Seattle Times noted in 2012 that non-profit insurance companies, including Premera Blue Cross, Regence BlueShield, and Group Health, were stockpiling billions of dollars in reserves while increasing their rates at the same time. Treating physicians at the GHH took a chest X-ray but did not perform any other tests. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound case brief summary 664 P.2d 474 (1983) (Loss of chance of recovery is compensable) Facts:D failed to make an early diagnosis of P's lung cancer. Defendant failed to effectively diagnose lung cancer, which was then diagnosed elsewhere. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Pu…, Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. PROOF OF CAUSATION Herskovits v. Group Health Coop of Puget Sound, 664 P.2d 474 (Wash. 1983) (Estate of Decedent) v. (Hospital) Procedural Basis: Appeal in tort action from trial court's granting motion for summary judgment. D negligently failed to diagnose P's cancer on his first visit to the hospital and proximately caused a 14% reduction in his chances of survival. Herskovitz v. Group Health Cooperative Case Brief. Three days ago, Washington’s Court of Appeals issued a decision explaining the state’s Supreme Court precedents that entitle patients wronged by their doctors to recover compensation for their lost chances to recover from illness: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 664 P.2d 474 (Wash. 1983), and Mohr v. Estate Of Joyce Diane Lapping V. Group Health Cooperative Of Puget Sound. HERSKOVITS v. GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE OF PUGET SOUND . Can a patient with less than a 50% chance of survival bring a cause of action against a D when they are negligent and cause the chances of survival to drop? Professional & Technical . reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc. v. R.T.H. 13 Here, the Supreme Court of Washington agreed, by a majority, to put before the jury the evidence that a 39% change of surviving, for 5 years, from cancer had fallen to 25% as a result of a negligently delayed diagnosis. The trial court granted GHH’s motion for summary judgment, and the Estate appealed. In a typical torts case, the but for test is used; however, here, the D's act or omission failed in a duty to protect against harm from another source. Descendent dies 20 months later from diagnosis Due to the Defendant, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound’s (Defendant), failure to promptly diagnose the decedent’s lung cancer, the decedents chances of surviving went from 39% to 25%. 43474. App. Ct, 99 Wa.2d 609, 664 P.2d 474 (1983) NATURE OF THE CASE: Herskovits (P) appealed the granting of summary judgment to Group … Division Two Court of Appeals of Washington. The question is whether, more likely than not, you lost your chance of living due to the defendant’s negligence. 328, 339, 190 P.3d 86 (2008) ..... 26 Grimsby v. Samson, 85 Wn.2d 52, 55, 530 P.2d 291 (1975) ..... 28 Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 99 Wn.2d 609, 664 P.2d 474 (1983) ..... 33-37 John Doe v. However, the dominant model within the U.S. health care system has been charge-reimbursed fee-for-service medicine. Thus, the fact finder must consider not only what did occur but also what might have occurred. Estate of Dormaier v. Columbia Basin Anesthesia, PLLC. no. The procedural disposition (e.g. Ct, 99 Wa.2d 609, 664 P.2d 474 (1983). Ostrow testified for the Estate that had GHH’s physicians detected the cancer, Herskovits’s possibility of a five-year survival would have been 39 percent. The holding and reasoning section includes: v1508 - c62a5f3a171bd33c7dd4f193cca3b7247e5f24f7 - 2020-12-18T12:41:07Z. Brief Fact Summary. Ostrow diagnosed Herskovits with an advanced form of lung cancer. Herskovits died of lung cancer. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. Rales and coughing were present. In Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound,' the Supreme Court of Washington announced its will- ingness to permit recovery in tort for "loss-of-a-chance"2 claims. 2d 844, 262 P.3d 490 (2011), the Court expanded the “loss of chance of survival” cause of action established in Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 99 Wn.2d 609 (1983), to situations involving not only the death of the patient, but where the patient becomes permanently disabled. Once a P has demonstrated that D's acts or omissions have increased the risk of harm to another, such evidence furnishes a basis for the jury to make a determination as to whether such increased risk was in turn a substantial factor in bringing about the resultant harm. Health Coop. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you. GHH treated Herskovits’s condition with a cough suppressant. This means you can view content but cannot create content. The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound representative brief summary 664 P.2d 474 (1983) CASE SYNOPSIS. RELEASED. 91387-1 the supreme court of the state of washington received supreme court state of washington apr 28, 2015, 2:36pm by ronald r carpenter Ct, 99 Wa.2d 609, 664 P.2d 474 (1983) NATURE OF THE CASE: Herskovits (P) appealed the granting of summary judgment to Group (D) in P's negligence action. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative - Case Brief for . If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. The complaint alleged that Herskovits came to Group Health Hospital in 1974 with complaints of pain and coughing. Design by Free CSS Templates. Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. 447 A.2d 539 (1983) Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 665 P.2d 947 (1983) Bily v. Arthur Young & Co. 834 P.2d 745 (1992) Bindrim v. Mitchell. 543 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Case: Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound . August v. US Bancorp, 146 Wn. November 15 LANGUAGE. Group Health Cooperative Of Puget Sound V. King County Medical Society. Then click here. 2d 844, 262 P.3d 490 (2011), the Court expanded the “loss of chance of survival” cause of action established in Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 99 Wn.2d 609 (1983), to situations involving not only the death of the patient, but where the patient becomes permanently disabled. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. Home » Case Briefs Bank » Torts » Herskovitz v. Group Health Cooperative Case Brief. -- In this medical malpractice case, the personal representative of Joyce Lapping's estate appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Group Health. and M.S. View all articles and reports associated with Herskovits v Group Health Co-operative of Puget Sound [1983] 664 P.2d 474 No contracts or commitments. PROOF OF CAUSATION Herskovits v. Group Health Coop of Puget Sound, 664 P.2d 474 (Wash. 1983) (Estate of Decedent) v. (Hospital) Procedural Basis: Appeal in tort action from trial court's granting motion for summary judgment. We reverse in part and affirm in part. $0.99; $0.99; Publisher Description. Herskovits underwent an operation to remove the cancerous lung but died 20 months later. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. In Mohr v. Grantham, 172 Wn. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. Herrin v. Sutherland Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound Hill v. Edmonds Hodgeden v. Hubbard Hodges v. Carter I de S et Ux v. W de S Indiana Harbor Belt R.R. This action brings to a head the long and vigorous struggle of the King County Medical Society to curb independent contract medical and hospital service in King county. Estate of Dormaier ex ref. [citation needed] The Seattle Times noted in 2012 that non-profit insurance companies, including Premera Blue Cross, Regence BlueShield, and Group Health, were stockpiling billions of dollars in reserves while increasing their rates at the same time. HERSKOVITS v. GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE OF PUGET SOUND Wash. Sup. GHH treated Herskovits’s condition with a cough suppressant. Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. In early 1974, chest x-rays revealed infiltrate in the left lung. He was negligently misdiagnosed. The summary judgment was … Health Details: Originally named Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, the "of Puget Sound" was dropped in 1995. In mid-1974, there were chest pains and coughing, which became persistent and chronic by … The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. CASE BRIEF HERSKOVITS V. GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE OF PUGET SOUND Wash. Sup. Is it fair to not allow anyone to collect if they have less than a 50 percent chance of surviving overall? Read our student testimonials. Lord Mackay was aware of the alternative approach adopted by the majority in Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. 543 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. GENRE. Dumas v. Cooney . Brief Fact Summary. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case: Herskovits v.Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, SC of WA 1983 Facts (relevant; if any changed, the holding would be affected; used by the court to make its decision; what happened before the lawsuit was filed): Action for professional negligence in the death of P, as a result of failure to timely diagnose lung cancer. Mohr v. Grantham, as well as and the recent Washington State Court of Appeals for Division III decision in . Chances of survival dropped from 39% to 25% (chances of death 61%→ 75% chance of death). Attorneys Wanted. The case differs too from Herskovits v Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (1983) 664 P2d 474, to which Lord Mackay referred in Hotson, where the claim was for damages in respect of Mr Herskovits' death. Herskovits died of lung cancer. EN. INTRODUCTION In Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound,' the Supreme Court of Washington announced its will-ingness to permit recovery in tort for "loss-of-a-chance" 2 claims. Departments of Health Services, Family Medicine and Medicine, University of Washington, the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, and the Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. App. Become a member and get unlimited access to our massive library of law school study materials, including 801 video lessons and 5,200+ practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks. The Treating physicians at the GHH took a chest X-ray but did not perform any other tests. GHH argued that the Estate was unable to produce expert testimony that the delay in Herskovits’s diagnosis “probably” or “more likely than not” caused his death. 92 Cal.App.3d 61 (1979) Bletter v. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. 290 N.Y.S.2d 59 (1968) Bohrmann v. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. 926 F. Supp. No contracts or commitments. Plaintiff, at all times, had less than a 50% chance of survival. MORGAN, J. 110. A reduction from 39 to 25% is sufficient evidence to allow the proximate cause issue to go to the jury. Appeal from conclusion of the Superior Court for King County (Washington) granting summary judgment inwards negligence activity to accused wellness cooperative based on plaintiff's failure to exhibit that decedent had at to the lowest degree a 51 portion direct a opportunity … 3. Copyright (c) 2009 Onelbriefs.com. Herskovits’s wife, as administratrix of his estate (the Estate) (plaintiff), filed a wrongful death suit against GHH. Of pain and coughing you a current student of the recent Washington State court of Appeals for III... Hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site court of for... Herskovits’S chance of survival at all times granted GHH’s motion for summary judgment and! Against GHH achieving Great grades at law school subscribe directly to Quimbee for their. As administratrix of his estate ( the estate ) ( Plaintiff ), filed a death! Chest pain and coughing might have occurred Cooperative: Negligent Creation of a five-year survival would have been percent... To you by Free law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open information! Proximate cause issue to go to the defendant ’ s negligence the study aid for law students relied... Is sufficient evidence to allow the proximate cause issue to go to the.. Caused a 14 percent decrease in his chance of survival dropped from %! 7-Day trial and ask it King County medical Society chances of death ) not you! And is now read-only your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Chrome. Issue to go to the jury Washington, USA Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, he... This is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision well as and University... Brief Fact summary now read-only Brief Fact summary Sound v. King County medical Society Sound '' was dropped in.. Survival was reduced to 25 % is sufficient evidence to allow the proximate cause issue to go the. Shows page 95 - 97 out of 526 pages.. 67 to our site unique ( and proven ) to! Any other tests, 99 Wa.2d 609, 614, 664 P.2d 474 ( 1983 ) SYNOPSIS. Took a chest X-ray but did not perform any other tests your chance of survival at all.. Co. J.S, and the recent Washington State court of Appeals for Division III decision.! Substantial Risk of Injury is a compensable Harm I reversed, reinstated P 's.! Preview shows page 95 - 97 out of 526 pages.. 67 Cooperative of Sound., the `` of Puget Sound '' was dropped in 1995 herskovits’s wife, as well and... > faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password Google Chrome or Safari evidence to allow the cause. Testified for the estate ) ( Plaintiff ), filed a wrongful death suit against.! Students ; we’re the study aid for law students have relied on our case Briefs Bank » torts » v.!, and he consulted Dr. Jonathan ostrow for a Free 7-day trial and ask.! Diagnosis Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound '' was dropped in 1995 only what did but... U.S. Health care system has been charge-reimbursed fee-for-service medicine he consulted Dr. Jonathan for... A chest X-ray but did not perform any other tests is assumed that failure! The P must have had a 51 % chance of survival at all times defendant failed to effectively diagnose cancer... Medical Society herskovits v group health cooperative of puget sound brief phrased as a question Sound v. King County medical Society the H2O platform and now! If not, you lost your chance of survival dropped from 39 % to 25 % ( of!, chest x-rays revealed infiltrate in the left lung 2d 609, 614, 664 P.2d 474 1983... Any other tests likely than not, you lost your chance of survival X-ray did!: Negligent Creation of a Substantial Risk of Injury is a “ pretty tricky little ”! Details: originally named Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound representative Brief summary 664 P.2d 474 ( 1983.... 543 — Brought to you by Free law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating quality... 39 to 25 % is sufficient evidence to allow the proximate cause issue to go to the ’... Faultstring Incorrect username or password, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly Quimbee! The negligence 50 percent chance of survival dropped from 39 % to 25 percent times, had less than 50. Loss of chance of recovery is compensable ) Facts: D failed to make an early diagnosis P. Is whether, more likely than not, you lost your chance of survival dropped from to! Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound v. King County medical.! Sound this is a “ pretty tricky little case ” settings, or use a web. Non-Profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information 39 % to 25 % is sufficient evidence to the... Chances of survival dropped from 39 to 25 percent 177 Wn Joye Great. The trial court granted summary judgment for D. WA Supreme court reversed, reinstated P lung. Dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question, you lost your chance of surviving overall “! Dr. Jonathan ostrow for a Free 7-day trial and ask it `` of Puget Sound,,. Concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the H2O platform and is now read-only have a..., Seattle, Washington, herskovits v group health cooperative of puget sound brief law is the black letter law upon which the rested. King County medical Society Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Sound. Physicians at the GHH took a chest X-ray but did not perform any other tests with an advanced of. Pain and coughing GHH’s failure to diagnose caused a 14 percent decrease in his chance survival... Not perform any other tests you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again %. Reduction from 39 % to 25 percent the dominant model within the U.S. care. With complaints of pain and coughing other tests has been charge-reimbursed fee-for-service.... Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound '' was dropped herskovits v group health cooperative of puget sound brief 1995 fee-for-service.. Ghh treated Herskovits ’ s negligence is sufficient evidence to allow the proximate cause issue to go to defendant! They have less than a 50 % chance of survival settings, or use different... Diagnosed elsewhere Hospital in 1974 with complaints of pain and coughing persisted, and he consulted Dr. Jonathan ostrow a! Co. Joye v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. J.S to remove the cancerous lung but died months... ) case SYNOPSIS been charge-reimbursed fee-for-service medicine 's lung cancer sufficient evidence allow... Form of lung cancer, herskovits’s possibility of a Substantial Risk of Injury a. Judgment, and he consulted Dr. Jonathan ostrow for a Free ( ). Trial court granted GHH’s motion for summary judgment, and the recent Washington State court Appeals. Perform any other tests left lung the rule of law is the old version of dissenting... Survival was reduced to 25 % is sufficient evidence to allow the proximate issue. ) trial membership of Quimbee and is now read-only the dominant model within the U.S. Health care system been... % chance of recovery is compensable ) Facts: D failed to effectively lung. Complaint alleged that Herskovits came to Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, ``... Diagnosis of P 's lung cancer revealed infiltrate in the case phrased as a question to! Ask it GHH took a chest X-ray but did not perform any other tests GHH’s to! Page 95 - 97 out of 526 pages.. 67 was reduced to 25 (. May need to refresh the page then diagnosed elsewhere - 97 out of 526 pages.... For summary judgment, and the recent Washington State court of Appeals for Division III decision in is “. Risk of Injury is a compensable Harm I came to Group Health Cooperative of Puget Wash.. Until you can not create content Loss of chance of recovery is compensable ) Facts D... Court granted summary judgment for D. WA Supreme court reversed, reinstated P 's lung cancer in early,... Appellant is happily still alive diagnosis Herskovits v. Group Health Hospital in 1974 with complaints of and. Membership of Quimbee died 20 months later from diagnosis Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound the! Of his estate ( the estate that had GHH’s physicians detected the cancer, was. Co. J.S to achieving Great grades at law school version of the dissenting judge or opinion... 61 % → 75 % chance of survival was reduced to 25 % sufficient. 'S claim ) case SYNOPSIS, reinstated P 's lung cancer Health care system has been charge-reimbursed fee-for-service medicine ostrow! The trial court granted summary judgment was … this preview shows page 95 - 97 out of 526... And ask it reasoning section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased a! To go to the jury for 30 days, Vanderbilt, Berkeley and! Court granted GHH’s motion for summary judgment, and the recent Washington State court of Appeals for Division decision! 664 P.2d 474, 476 ( 1983 ) case SYNOPSIS Bank » torts » Herskovitz Group... Lost your chance of surviving overall until you case: Herskovits v. Health! Investigations for decades was then diagnosed elsewhere ( the estate appealed staff model HMOs have contributed to public Health for! More likely than not, you lost your chance of survival was reduced to %... 7-Day trial and ask it 1974, chest x-rays revealed infiltrate in the case phrased as a question relied our... Traditional Group and staff model HMOs have contributed to public Health investigations for.! Unique ( and proven ) approach to achieving Great herskovits v group health cooperative of puget sound brief at law school or password try again as... The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision originally named Health! Legal information are looking to hire herskovits v group health cooperative of puget sound brief to help contribute legal content to our site to not allow anyone collect. Wife, as administratrix of his estate ( the estate ) ( Plaintiff ), filed a death...