The colours were very accurate, if perhaps a little less saturated. It makes my heart sing to do this for so many beautiful humans. That being said, these are not your only optionsyou may find that Portra 160 is your new jam! Not all is lost, and in the future, we might very well see a new or updated emulsion to replace Pro 400H. Kodak Portra 400 has a warmer base than Fuji 400H. The above images are from some testing we did on pushing & pulling film. But you can not meter your Kodak film the same way. When you master exposure on a new film stock and find the sweet spot for your look/style, you give the lab a better negative. Interesting article. Can you clear these out, or at least sort the listings so the sold out films dont dominate the search? To change your privacy setting, e.g. That consistency then carries over to your photographs.
And it seems cassettes tapes the worst of all analog music transmission mediums are selling again, as well. The data sheets even list the same number of LP/mm I think. 
I used it until Portra 400 came out. Companies making this kind of decision usually hide behind corporate speak to mollify the angry mob. Through the process, the number one wrench in the works has always been photographers exposing Kodak film like Fujifilm (aka, overexposing it). This helps Casual Photophile produce the content we produce. 400h fujifilm pro 35mm 36exp cart Immediately begin stressing out. Press J to jump to the feed.
I would always keep the better quality product over the cheaper one, though I know arguments can be made the other way.
The current supply chain issues with color negative film are to say the least very concerning. Ive found the Billingham 335 bag perfect for my needs. This way, youll get even more insight into the entire world of analog photography, and we can keep on with providing this free, but well researched editorial online content for everyone to enjoy! New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. In measurable metrics like sales, and less measurable ones like prestige, Portra 400 has been the unchallenged big cheese for years. > But I do think were hyping something in death that we never really hyped while it was alive. Privacy Policy, Color Profile vs Color Pac (It's Probably Not What You Think! The reason why it blends with Fuji 400H so well is it has a more neutral color base and tends to render less red tones than Portra 400. Theres no denying that Pro 400H had many devoted fans (especially amongst medium format wedding shooters talk about a niche within a niche), or that its a great film. If you have a color profile with Richard that was created using Fuji 400H, contact us at info@richardphotolab.com! So, I came to completelly different conclusion. This is the sister sub of r/analog, where all of the non-photo-sharing stuff happens! The ones that give meaning to our lives. Fujifilm has announced that they are discontinuing the production of their film stock PRO 400H which is the most favorite film stock amongst wedding photographers.
Not sure why superia 400 isn't further up here. 
It certainly hurts more to see a professional grade film be discontinued than say, a consumer film like Agfa Vista (in spite of my own personal feelings.)
400H was a great film. Well, I was happy with Pro 400H, but when Portra 400 came out, I tried it out and noticed a big improvement in sharpness and lack of grain. But there are also a number of foundational similarities that make it a good choice: the speed, the beautiful skin tones, the fine grain, the natural color saturation. Enter the username or e-mail you used in your profile. Learn how here.
The other option they suggest is Kodak Portra 160. When each line runs out, they announce its discontinuation. All Film How To, Richard Photo Lab. We use those preferences as a target for your scans, and the target itself doesnt really change because youre using a new stockit just changes one of the materials were aiming with. ), Communicating your scan preferences precisely. We'd suggest that you try Noritsu. If you should digital at all then you should really thank Fujifilm for the current trend towards more simplistic, classic feeling digital cameras that feel like a welcome change from the plastic behemoths of the 2000s. The laziest way to look at Fuji and Kodak is by treating them as equal competitors. Or motoring.
So I think it is logical to expect the film to be in the market for over a year or so. The second is how the lab handles your film, because the same negative can be scanned many different ways. 400h verpackung spiske
I love the first one especially with the boat. I actually find that superia 400 has as much resolution as 400h. trendclothingshop 400h He said that it is a good practice to shoot at box speed or rating Kodak Portra 400 at 200 ISO if you are shooting darker skin colors. Well Chris, I get digital Johnnys of all ages staring at my Leicaflex SL cameras all the time: I carry a pair of Leicaflex SL bodies and 35/2-50/2-90/2.8 and a Gossen Lunalite meter as my inbuilt meters are defunct.
Is the knowledge you will get from testing an important investment in getting the long-term results you want? In the last few years they have resurrected both P3200 and Ektachrome and have hinted early this year that their 2021 plans include bringing one new film to market and bringing another back from the dead. Regards. Our friend Sandra Coan spent a year testing Kodak filmssee some of her results here. We want to be honest with you about what is possible and what isnt, what you can expect when transitioning to a new stock, and give you practical tips for getting through this not just painlessly, but with flying colors (wink). Yes, there is enough Fuji 400H left in the world that you wont be forced to switch immediately.
I didnt buy five rolls in the wake of the announcement so that I could grift on it down the road, but because I took some pretty decent images with it and I want the chance to do it again someday. Kodak has no more chance to win this film challenge. Its kind of like that TV show Say Yes to the Dress when the salesperson tells the bride not to try on a frock thats over their budgetevery other dress will never seem as good in comparison, even though the other dresses are the only ones the bride can get. Ive met several younger people (25 and below) who are very interested in discussing my cameras and film photography when they see me out and about with one of my many old cameras. Interesting article. That ship is sailing on Fuji Pro 400H. Sometimes we have to approve comments for whatever reason. Stephen Wood of Photovision Prints mentioned that Kodak Portra 400 would be the best alternative to Fujifilm PRO 400H at the moment.
But this is much too narrow a way to view Fuji. 400h fuji exposures Maybe it comes back one day, maybe not. Superia latitude isn't as good as 400h tho, so portra 400 is another alternative and some labs can colour correct your portra to be more cool toned and like 400h.
I dont think we should be worried about film disappearing altogether. Richard Photo Lab also warns the photographers not to overexpose their Kodak films. This is about getting the BEST results, not the SAME results. I did it myself by buying five rolls when I really havent ever shot this film regularly before.
Youll want to grab your light meter and do some bracketed test rolls. We get it! Viewed through the same prism, Fujifilm would appear to be on a downward trajectory. Guess I am going back to Ektar 100 again, once I finish the last rolls of 400H in my freezer. Ill admit to never being a huge 400H fan myself, am more a fan of Superiaconsidering that also has the 4th color layer technology, Im wondering how long before thats axed too. fujifilm 400h film 35mm pro fujicolor fuji negative iso roll single exposures exp unboxed c200 exposure professional adorama cart Period. Speaking of testing, were doing our own in-depth testing now on different ways to shoot and process other stocks to see what steps will help get Kodak stocks looking closer to Fujifilm. However, doing this is not exactly free for us: We pay our editorial staff, have operating costs and need to keep our business running. He said that those who want to get PRO 400H look from Portra 400 should use a Noritsu scanner instead of a Frontier scanner. What we need to be worried about as film photographers is an attack on the processing chemicals as being bad for the environment, which Ive heard on more than one occasion in online discussions about the future of analog photography. The Find Lab made a blog post back in 2016 about making Kodak Portra 400 look like Fuji PRO 400H. Read the news and absorb many hot takes. pro iso 35mm 400h exp fujicolor pack larger And cameras and film stocks are just tools to achieve beautiful photos. While this answer will be different for everyone, Portra 400 and Portra 800 are certainly the strongest contenders.
Well, its interesting how USA vs the world plays here. The supply of consumer grade negative films like Fujicolor 200 is very spotty. A password reset link will be sent to you by email. I really like the color balance on it. Yes. Fuji even admitted that public outcry was a motivating factor in the resurrection. Photographers are looking for alternative film stocks to achieve a similar look of Fujifilm PRO 400H.
fuji 35mm pro 400h film x5 adorama 400h fujifilm fujicolor We have a guideline at Richard called the 3 jobs rulewe usually use it in the context of switching to a new lab, but it also applies to this scenario. If you take one hard-and-fast piece of advice from this blog (besides the importance of testing), let it be this: DONT OVEREXPOSE YOUR KODAK FILM!!!
What drew me to it is the cooler tones and less contrasty and saturated colours than what you see with portra etc. cinestill might be another option if you can afford it. However, I have always disliked battery dependent cameras. You simply cannot expose Kodak film the way you do Fujifilm. Imagine thinking Wow, well at least we still have Pro 400H.. SHOULD I TEST A NEW FILM ALONGSIDE MY FUJI 400H?
Imagine thinking Wow, well at least we still have Pro 400H. Its not the same degree of consolation, is it? As other film labs suggested, Richard Photo Lab also suggests using Noritsu scanner over Frontier scanner, since it gives the lab more control over the final appearance of the scans. Seconding this, C200 is definitely my go to for 35mm. I was wondering what some of you think the best alternative would be?
Its really a shame that this film is being discontinued. But true, that could be something to watch out for. The fear factor of losing Pro 400H seems to center on the fact that the number of choices for professional-grade 400 speed films has gone from two, down to one. We cover these costs with our quarterly print magazine SilvergrainClassics, and we are mighty proud of it.
If visions of Acros are dancing across your head, you might be suffering from whiplash. Portra 800 is actually a stock that many Fuji shooters already turn to once the light gets low and they need a higher speed film. Want more info? But there are definitely more important things that you can tell us than I used to shoot Fuji 400H and now Im shooting XYZ. All details in our privacy policy.
Fujifilm mentioned that they had to make this hard decision because of difficulties to procure the raw materials needed to produce PRO 400H. The first is how you expose your filmit may very well be the number one influencer of a final film image. In fact, it is VITAL!
Reactions were quick and the takes quite hot, with one headline going so far as to call the loss of Pro 400H is a giant step towards the grave for the film industry. Nothing from Fuji compare to Ektar 100, Tmax 400, TriX, ProImage 100, The 2 only best Fuji are Velvia 50 and Neopan Acros, 2 films, yes very good, how many have only think with Fuji Film before, what about now ? 400h C200 is a pretty underrated film generally, but its usefulness depends greatly on your conditions.
I accept only a select number of weddings each year to preserve creativity and ensure each couple receives the quality of service they deserve. And if you tested the two scanners with your Fuji 400H and found you preferred the Frontier, the idea of switching might sound a little "iffy". They suggest photographers to test different photo stocks to find out what works best for them. Thankfully we can say more for Pro 400H. Portra is much sharper and finer-grained. You CAN learn to expose your new stock in a different way to get results you love. The Pro 400H vs. Portra debate has always felt like arguing Coke vs. Pepsi, or even Dr. Pepper vs. Mr. Pibb. Good news, but also bittersweet notice the higher price tag for the new and improved Acros. As far as conspiracy theories go thats a good one. in But rambling through social media will not help either. We can make the necessary tweaks together when you are switching to a new stock. The look of Fujifilm PRO 400H won't disappear overnight, of course. For me it represents exactly why film images look so good. Ive never heard that rumor before, but its interesting.
Stephen Woods mentioned that Kodak Portra 800 could be another alternative to Fujifilm PRO 400H under specific light conditions like blue hour. When you can really pinpoint what visual elements you dont like, we can work together to figure out the cause. The news that Fujifilm will stop producing their PRO 400H film has hit film photographers like a ton of bricks. Its just too yellow, orange and red and you can never really get the color cast out, no matter of the scanner or exposure. Fujifilm C200 has fine grain and it is a bit contrasty. Portra 800 compliments Fuji 400H quite well. Seeing the same shot side-by-side on different stocks can be a great way to compare the inherent qualities of a film stock.
When Fuji discontinued Pro 160NS, silently and without much notice, the film was soon gone from shelves all across the world, but in late 2020 has reappeared in new packaging and for the Japanese market only and currently is being imported to Europe (in a geographical sense, sadly) by Nick and Trick in the UK. Is the loss of Fuji Pro 400H really pushing the film industry towards its demise? What do we think of the Internets idea that Fuji hasnt made any film for years, and is just using up its remaining frozen stock? Because Noritsu has more flexibility in terms of adjusting the colors and contrast.
The best time to talk about the fact that youve made a switch is AFTER youve gotten some scans back on a new stock. If you dont believe me, imagine the situation was reversed and Portra was discontinued. Its a shame any time we lose a film. Am I in moderation now after this comment? Because Portra 400 has a yellow base and because Noritsu primarily works in the magenta and green channel, so there is less yellow in the scans. To be fair, Kodaks competitor for tri-x and t-max has always been Ilford, not Fuji. its interesting how people overlook Adox silvermax being discontinued. 2. Lots of film is on backorder at the moment. fujifilm 400h 400h discontinued filtergrade He has previously worked in journalism, public history and public relations. But getting a head start trying out new stocks now means that you can seamlessly transition to shooting a new film fulltime once your stash runs dry. As Kodachrome 25 and 64 are no longer with us, I have used a Velvia 50 for slides but relied on ae in a pair of R-E bodies. 5. But it is not a good replacement for 120 format. I am offering mentoring sessions and resources to photographers to step up their business. 400h Both images were scanned on Noritsu for a neutral color balance and neutral density (lightness/darkness). t64 tungsten fuji They mention that Kodak Portra 400 and Kodak Portra 800 are the strongest film stock options. Posted
it also lacks consistency 4th layer of Pro 400H makes it look equally good in every situation, while Porta is tempremental, it can be beautiful on one shot and sucks completelly on another.